Sandoval v. California

509 U.S. 954, 114 S. Ct. 40
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 28, 1993·No. No. 92-9049·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Case consolidated with No. 92-8894, Victor v. Nebraska, immediately supra, and a total of 90 minutes allotted for oral argument. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 9, 1993. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 7, 1993. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 21, 1993. This Court’s Rule 29 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandoval v. California, 509 U.S. 954, 114 S. Ct. 40 (1993).

509 U.S. 954 (Sandoval v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

(HC) Jackson v. Horn
E.D. California, 2025
(HC) Myers v. Phillips
E.D. California, 2023
Victor Manuel Solis v. Rosie Garcia
219 F.3d 922 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
People v. Swain
33 Cal. App. 4th 499 (California Court of Appeal, 1995)
People v. Crittenden
885 P.2d 887 (California Supreme Court, 1994)
People v. Jenkins
29 Cal. App. 4th 287 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
People v. Felix
23 Cal. App. 4th 1385 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
People v. Gonzales
22 Cal. App. 4th 1744 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
People v. Hammond
22 Cal. App. 4th 1611 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
People v. Lopez
20 Cal. App. 4th 897 (California Court of Appeal, 1993)
People v. Wash
861 P.2d 1107 (California Supreme Court, 1993)