Sanderwala, LLC v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 30, 2022
DocketA23I0106
StatusPublished

This text of Sanderwala, LLC v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC (Sanderwala, LLC v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanderwala, LLC v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 30, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23I0106. SANDERWALA, LLC et al. v. CATAMOUNT PROPERTIES 2018, LLC.

This case is a property dispute between plaintiff Catamount Properties 2018, LLC and multiple defendants. On November 3, 2022, the trial court entered an order granting the plaintiff’s motion to add Legal Services Group, LLC (“LSG”) as a defendant and a separate order denying defendant Sanderwala LLC’s motion for summary judgment. The court certified its orders for immediate review on November 28, 2022, and defendants Viren R. Patel; Sanderwala, LLC; and LSG filed this application for interlocutory review. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only if the trial court “certifies within ten days of entry” of the order at issue that immediate review should be had. A timely certificate of immediate review is a jurisdictional requirement, see Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc., 133 Ga. App. 23, 24 (2) (209 SE2d 715) (1974), and if the certificate of immediate review is not entered within the prescribed ten-day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until final judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973). Here, the certificate of immediate review was entered 25 days after entry of the orders on appeal, making it untimely. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/30/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Harper
200 S.E.2d 748 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc.
209 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sanderwala, LLC v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanderwala-llc-v-catamount-properties-2018-llc-gactapp-2022.