Sanders v. State

26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 651, 796 So. 2d 533, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1908
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 26, 2001·No. No. SC00-1688·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of Sanders v. State, 765 So.2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), based on certified conflict with T.E.J. v. State, 749 So.2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Stanton v. State, 746 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); and Brown v. State, 652 So.2d 877 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Upon further consideration, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

[534] WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 651, 796 So. 2d 533, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1908 (Fla. 2001).

26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 651 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
812 So. 2d 609 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)