Sanders v. O'Brien

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanders v. O'Brien. Read the opinion of the Court — 376 F. App'x 306
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2009·No. 09-7358·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7358

ROOSEVELT CORNELL SANDERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00026-gec-mfu)

Submitted: October 5, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Rick A. Mountcastle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Sanders v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00026-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. June 30,

2009). We deny as moot Sanders’ motions to expedite the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. O'Brien, (4th Cir. 2009).

Sanders v. O'Brien (Sanders v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241