Sanders v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Sanders v. O'Brien

333 F. App'x 791

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanders v. O'Brien. Read the opinion of the Court — 376 F. App'x 306 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2009·No. No. 09-7358·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See [792]*792Sanders v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 7:09-cv-00026-gec-mfu, 2009 WL 1917093 (W.D.Va. June 30, 2009). We deny as moot Sanders’ motions to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See [792]*792Sanders v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 7:09-cv-00026-gec-mfu, 2009 WL 1917093 (W.D.Va. June 30, 2009). We deny as moot Sanders’ motions to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sanders v. O'Brien, 333 F. App'x 791 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 791 (Sanders v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related