Sanders 146274 v. Arizona, State of

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedApril 15, 2024
Docket2:24-cv-00750
StatusUnknown

This text of Sanders 146274 v. Arizona, State of (Sanders 146274 v. Arizona, State of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders 146274 v. Arizona, State of, (D. Ariz. 2024).

Opinion

1 JL 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Michael Martin Sanders, No. CV-24-00750-PHX-JAT (DMF) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 State of Arizona, et al., 13 Defendants.

14 15 I. Procedural History 16 On July 8, 2022, Plaintiff Michael Martin Sanders, who is confined in the Arizona 17 State Prison Complex-Lewis, filed a Complaint (Doc. 1-1 at 8-10, Doc. 1-2)1 in the 18 Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, against the State of Arizona. On May 3, 19 2023, the State of Arizona filed an Answer. (Doc. 1-14 at 30-35, Doc. 1-15 at 1-2.) On 20 February 23, 2024, the state court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint but 21 struck certain portions of the proposed First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 1-17 at 9-10.) 22 Plaintiff named the State of Arizona, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Ryan Thornell, Larry 23 Gann, Grant Phillips, Michael Delgado, C. Robles, Melissa Michel, Shelly Saunders, 24 David Nguyen, and Oyuki Coronado as Defendants in the First Amended Complaint. (Id. 25 at 12-38.) On April 3, 2024, Defendant State of Arizona filed a Notice of Removal and 26 removed the case to this Court. (Doc. 1.) 27

28 1 The citation refers to the document and page number generated by the Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system. 1 II. Removal 2 A state court defendant may remove to federal court any civil action brought in the 3 state court over which the federal district courts would have original jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. 4 § 1441(a). In his First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that 5 Defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights. This Court’s jurisdiction extends to 6 such claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a federal court has original jurisdiction “of all civil 7 actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”). The Notice 8 of Removal was filed within 30 days of the filing of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, 9 and the State of Arizona is the only Defendant that has been served. It therefore appears 10 this case was timely and properly removed. 11 III. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 12 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 13 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 14 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). After screening is complete, the Court will notify the parties if an 15 answer to any subsequently filed amended complaint is required. 16 The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised claims 17 that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be 18 granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2). If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the 20 allegation of other facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint 21 before dismissal of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) 22 (en banc). 23 Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4 requires in part that “[a]ll complaints . . . by 24 incarcerated persons must be signed and legibly written or typewritten on forms approved 25 by the Court and in accordance with the instructions provided with the forms.” Plaintiff’s 26 First Amended Complaint is not on this Court’s approved form. The Court may, in its 27 discretion, forgo the requirement that a plaintiff use a court-approved form. See LRCiv 28 3.4. The Court will require use of the court-approved form because Plaintiff’s First 1 Amended Complaint substantially differs from the court-approved form. Thus, the Court 2 will dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint without prejudice and with leave to 3 amend, in order for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint on a court-approved form. 4 IV. Leave to Amend 5 Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a second amended complaint on a court- 6 approved form. The Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for 7 filing a second amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the 8 Court may strike the second amended complaint and dismiss this action without further 9 notice to Plaintiff. 10 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second 11 Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 12 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 13 Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one 14 claim per count. 15 A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and the First 16 Amended Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach 17 Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, 18 the Court will treat the original Complaint and the First Amended Complaint as 19 nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original 20 Complaint or the First Amended Complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was 21 dismissed without prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a second amended complaint. 22 Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 23 V. Warnings 24 A. Address Changes 25 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 26 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 27 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 28 action. 1 B. Possible Dismissal 2 If Plaintiff fails to ttmely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 3) warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d 4) at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of 5 | the Court). 6| ITIS ORDERED: 7 (1) ‘Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 1-17 at 12-38) is dismissed for 8 | failure to file on a court-approved form. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. 10 (2) — If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk 11 | of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 13 (3) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. 15 Dated this 15th day of April, 2024. 16 17 a 18 19 _ James A. Teil Org Senior United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sanders 146274 v. Arizona, State of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-146274-v-arizona-state-of-azd-2024.