Sander v. Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacturers

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 7, 2023·No. 7:21-cv-10684·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 10684 (VB) JUDGMENT ENERCO GROUP, INC. (incorrectly sued herein as “Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacture”), Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 6, 2023, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 7, 2023

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerkof Court BY: a MANGE Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sander v. Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacturers, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Sander v. Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacturers (Sander v. Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacturers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)