Sander v. Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacturers
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 10684 (VB) JUDGMENT ENERCO GROUP, INC. (incorrectly sued herein as “Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacture”), Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 6, 2023, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 7, 2023
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerkof Court BY: a MANGE Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sander v. Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacturers (Sander v. Mr. Heater Electric Space Heater Manufacturers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.