Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co.

215 A.D. 728
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 215 A.D. 728 (Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., 215 A.D. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Under section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law no claim for medical or surgical treatment is enforcible, except (1) as incidental to, or a part of, an award to an injured employee; and (2) unless, within twenty days following the first treatment, the physician or surgeon furnishing the treatment shall furnish to the employer and the Industrial Board a report of the injury and treatment on a form prescribed by the Industrial Board. This applies to every claim by a physician or surgeon for services rendered to an injured employee, payment of which is sought through an award by the Industrial Board and whether employed by the employer or employee; this of course has no application to the right of a physician or surgeon to recover at law from the employer for services rendered at his request. Award modified by striking therefrom the amounts awarded as compensation to the claimant on account of medical bills of physicians, as follows: Dr. Roth, $185; Dr. Roth, $20; Dr. Grossman, $75; Dr. Grossman, $400; Dr. Schwartz, $327; and as so modified unanimously affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elting v. Will & Baumer Candle Co.
86 A.D.2d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Claim of Cresbin v. Feldman
235 A.D. 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Merrimac Anthracite Coal Corp. v. Showalter
163 S.E. 73 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1932)
Claim of Weisberg v. Alexander Bros. Furniture Co.
235 A.D. 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Peterson v. Erie Railroad
228 A.D. 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Claim of Finkelstein v. New York Merchandise Co.
225 A.D. 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Claim of Gordon v. Elmira, Corning & Waverly Railroad Co.
226 A.D. 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Frant v. Robert Cobban & Son, Inc.
133 Misc. 433 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Fraiman v. Elizabeth's
224 A.D. 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
State Treasurer v. Riter-Conley Co.
215 A.D. 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandberg-v-seymour-dress-co-nyappdiv-1925.