Fraiman v. Elizabeth's
This text of 224 A.D. 798 (Fraiman v. Elizabeth's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hinman, J., concur for award to a brother of the injured employee [799]*799rather than to the employee, on the ground that this question is not raised; if it had been raised the award could not have been made. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 33; Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc., 215 App. Div. 728.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.D. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fraiman-v-elizabeths-nyappdiv-1928.