Fraiman v. Elizabeth's
224 A.D. 798
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1928·Published
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hinman, J., concur for award to a brother of the injured employee [799] rather than to the employee, on the ground that this question is not raised; if it had been raised the award could not have been made. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 33; Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc., 215 App. Div. 728.)
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fraiman v. Elizabeth's, 224 A.D. 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
224 A.D. 798 (Fraiman v. Elizabeth's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Douglas v. Kenn-Well Contracting Company
164 N.E. 603 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co.
215 A.D. 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)