Sandas v. Kraemer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sandas v. Kraemer

275 A.D.2d 364, 712 N.Y.S.2d 420, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8686

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 14, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 364 (Sandas v. Kraemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sandas v. Kraemer, 275 A.D.2d 364, 712 N.Y.S.2d 420, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated August 23, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the risk which resulted in the injuries sustained by the plaintiff George Sandas is one which is inherent in the sport which he was playing, and, accordingly, that he assumed that risk (see, Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 484). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated August 23, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the risk which resulted in the injuries sustained by the plaintiff George Sandas is one which is inherent in the sport which he was playing, and, accordingly, that he assumed that risk (see, Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 484). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 364, 712 N.Y.S.2d 420, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandas-v-kraemer-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack