Friedman v. Universal Martial Arts of America, Inc.

282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 373, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3838

This text of 282 A.D.2d 572 (Friedman v. Universal Martial Arts of America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friedman v. Universal Martial Arts of America, Inc., 282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 373, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gigante, J.), entered June 7, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that, under the circumstances, the plaintiff, a karate student, assumed the risk of injury that was inherent in learning that sport (see, Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471; Sandas v Kraemer, 275 AD2d 364). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. State
685 N.E.2d 202 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Sandas v. Kraemer
275 A.D.2d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 373, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-universal-martial-arts-of-america-inc-nyappdiv-2001.