Sanchez v. Walters

Fourth Circuit

Sanchez v. Walters

55 F. App'x 703

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2003·No. 02-7824·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Angel Sanchez seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Sanchez has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Sanchez v. Walters, No. CA-02-257-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Angel Sanchez seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Sanchez has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Sanchez v. Walters, No. CA-02-257-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Sanchez v. Walters, 55 F. App'x 703 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 703 (Sanchez v. Walters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related