Sanchez v. State

438 S.W.2d 915, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 845
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanchez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2061
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 9, 1969·No. No. 42004·Published

Opinion

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for felony theft; the punishment, two years.

The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C. P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court “[wjithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court” or dur[916]*916ing any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

Nothing appears in the record which should be considered under the provisions of Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

No question of indigency is presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez v. State, 438 S.W.2d 915, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 845 (Tex. 1969).

438 S.W.2d 915 (Sanchez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yarbrough v. State
408 S.W.2d 230 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Melick v. State
409 S.W.2d 412 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Dewitt v. State
409 S.W.2d 852 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Ochoa v. State
424 S.W.2d 642 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Hill v. State
403 S.W.2d 797 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)