Sanchez v. Marseilles Hotel

792 So. 2d 1287, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12828, 2001 WL 1035953
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 2001·No. No. 1D00-2603·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order denying benefits in this workers’ compensation case on [1288] grounds Valentin Sanchez failed to prove that The Marseilles Hotel was his “statutory employer.” See § 440.10(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995). Mr. Sanchez worked for a hotel tenant, Vittorio’s Restaurant. The judge of compensation claims found that The Marseilles Hotel never made a contract, performance of any part of which was delegated to Vittorio’s Restaurant. See Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co., 667 So.2d 167, 169 (Fla.1995). Testimony that the lease was the only agreement of any kind between the hotel and the restaurant was uncontroverted.

Affirmed.

WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur; ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez v. Marseilles Hotel, 792 So. 2d 1287, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12828, 2001 WL 1035953 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

792 So. 2d 1287 (Sanchez v. Marseilles Hotel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowry's Reports, Inc. v. Legg Mason, Inc.
271 F. Supp. 2d 737 (D. Maryland, 2003)