Sanchez v. Adler
This text of 334 F. App'x 96 (Sanchez v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Jose Octavio Lopez Sanchez appeals pro se from a magistrate [97]*97judge’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.
Sanchez contends that his due process rights were violated by a Disciplinary Hearing Officer’s determination that he possessed a prohibited weapon and a prohibited drug or narcotic. The record reflects that procedural safeguards were met and that “some evidence” demonstrates that Sanchez possessed the prohibited contraband. See Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-56, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F. App'x 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-adler-ca9-2009.