San Filippo v. New York City Department of Buildings

68 A.D.3d 421, 889 N.Y.2d 576
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The administrative determination had a rational basis, since petitioner failed to demonstrate that all the work he performed in the trade was supervised by a licensed master or special electrician (see Matter of Auringer v Department of Citywide Admin. Servs. of City of N.Y., 28 AD3d 381 [2006]; Matter of Reingold v Koch, 111 AD2d 688 [1985], affd 66 NY2d 994 [1985]).

Petitioner’s remaining arguments are unpreserved for our review, as he failed to raise them at the hearing before the Electrical License Board. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

San Filippo v. New York City Department of Buildings, 68 A.D.3d 421, 889 N.Y.2d 576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 421 (San Filippo v. New York City Department of Buildings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related