Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 491
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 Cust. Ct. 641
United States Customs Court·Decided September 27, 1960·No. Reap. Dec. 9787; Entry No. 4423, etc.·Published

Opinion

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in the schedule, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof consists of bamboo blinds and sets of hardware accessories imported from Japan; and that each bamboo blind, as invoiced, is accompanied by one set of hardware accessories.
That on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise hereinbefore described, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and [492]*492in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the invoice unit values; that said unit values include the cost of the sets of hardware accessories, which cost is 3 cents (U.S. Cy) per set of hardware accessories; and that there was no higher foreign value.
That the above appeals for reappraisement are limited to the merchandise hereinbefore described and are abandoned as to all other merchandise; and that said appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoice unit values, which said unit values include the cost of the sets of hardware accessories of 3 cents (U.S. currency) per set.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 491 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 491 (Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.