Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 784
United States Customs Court·Decided April 9, 1958·No. Reap. Dec. 9121; Entry No. 4458, etc.·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to certain machinery exported from England and entered at the port of Baltimore, Md.

[785]*785Stipulated facts upon which these cases are before me establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value thereof is “the invoiced F. O. B. seaport price plus 5 per cent,” and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 784 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 784 (Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.