Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer

680 F.3d 1084, 2012 WL 1760700
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2012·No. 12-16084·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Order; Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.

AMENDED ORDER

A panel of this Court issued an opinion affirming the district court’s denial of petitioner’s motion for a preliminary injunction and denying his motion for a stay of execution. Petitioner filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The Warden elected not to file an optional response.

Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases when an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline was established by which any judge could request a vote on whether the panel’s opinion should be reheard en banc. A judge timely requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A majority of the judges eligible to vote did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc. Judges Ikuta, Murguia, and Nguyen were recused.

Therefore, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. En banc proceedings with respect to the panel opinion are concluded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer, 680 F.3d 1084, 2012 WL 1760700 (9th Cir. 2012).

680 F.3d 1084 (Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Amendment Coalition v. Charles Ryan
938 F.3d 1069 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Inc. v. Ryan
188 F. Supp. 3d 940 (D. Arizona, 2016)
Cook v. State
281 P.3d 1053 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2012)