Samuel Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.

310 F.2d 128
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 15, 1962
Docket27724_1
StatusPublished

This text of 310 F.2d 128 (Samuel Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 310 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

310 F.2d 128

Samuel DINERMAN, Appellant,
v.
BOWLEY & TRAVERS, INC., Appellee.

No. 117.

Docket 27724.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 15, 1962.

Decided November 15, 1962.

Irving P. Dinerman, New York City (Dinerman & Klatzke, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Charles Sutton, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Bonom & Wolfson, Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the order of the district court which directed the Lincoln Savings Bank to pay to the appellee the sum of $816.65 which it holds on deposit in the name of the appellant, in satisfaction of a judgment against him. The judgment, representing costs and disbursements, arose out of the previous appeal to this court which was determined adversely to the appellant in Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 301 F.2d 464 (2 Cir., 1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
310 F.2d 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-dinerman-v-bowley-travers-inc-ca2-1962.