Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.

Second Circuit

Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.

310 F.2d 128

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 15, 1962

DocketNo. 117, Docket 27724

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 310 F.2d 128 (Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 310 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the order of the district court which directed the Lincoln Savings Bank to pay to the appellee the sum of $816.65 which it holds on deposit in the name of the appellant, in satisfaction of a judgment against him. The judgment, representing costs and disbursements, arose out of the previous appeal to this court which was determined adversely to the appellant in Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 301 F.2d 464 (2 Cir., 1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the order of the district court which directed the Lincoln Savings Bank to pay to the appellee the sum of $816.65 which it holds on deposit in the name of the appellant, in satisfaction of a judgment against him. The judgment, representing costs and disbursements, arose out of the previous appeal to this court which was determined adversely to the appellant in Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 301 F.2d 464 (2 Cir., 1962).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 F.2d 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinerman-v-bowley-travers-inc-ca2-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack