Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.

Second Circuit

Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.

310 F.2d 128

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 15, 1962·No. No. 117, Docket 27724·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the order of the district court which directed the Lincoln Savings Bank to pay to the appellee the sum of $816.65 which it holds on deposit in the name of the appellant, in satisfaction of a judgment against him. The judgment, representing costs and disbursements, arose out of the previous appeal to this court which was determined adversely to the appellant in Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 301 F.2d 464 (2 Cir., 1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the order of the district court which directed the Lincoln Savings Bank to pay to the appellee the sum of $816.65 which it holds on deposit in the name of the appellant, in satisfaction of a judgment against him. The judgment, representing costs and disbursements, arose out of the previous appeal to this court which was determined adversely to the appellant in Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 301 F.2d 464 (2 Cir., 1962).

Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 310 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

310 F.2d 128 (Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related