Samson v. County of Nassau

78 A.D.2d 657, 434 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13150
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1980·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

a proceeding pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a late notice of claim, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 22, 1980, which denied their motion "for leave to renew” a prior order of the same court, dated January 11, 1980, which had denied their application. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioners’ motion for renewal was, in reality, a motion for reargument, as no new matter was presented therein which was unavailable to the petitioners prior to the order dated January 11, 1980 (see Matter of Dowling v Bowen, 53 AD2d 862, mot for lv to app den 40 NY2d 806; see, also, Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568). It is axiomatic that an order denying a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samson v. County of Nassau, 78 A.D.2d 657, 434 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

78 A.D.2d 657 (Samson v. County of Nassau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munz v. La Guardia Hospital
109 A.D.2d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
F & G Heating Co. v. Board of Education
103 A.D.2d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Town of Greenburgh v. Bahou
90 A.D.2d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cardona v. City of New York
82 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Flock v. Flock
81 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Erlich v. Erlich
80 A.D.2d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)