Flock v. Flock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Flock v. Flock

81 A.D.2d 605, 441 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 81 A.D.2d 605 (Flock v. Flock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flock v. Flock, 81 A.D.2d 605, 441 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 26, 1980, which denied his motion for “leave to reargue and renew” his prior application to vacate a default judgment entered against him. Appeal dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Defendant’s motion to reargue and renew was, in reality a motion only to reargue, as no new matter was presented which was unavailable to the defendant prior to the denial of his application to vacate a default judgment (Matter of Samson v County of Nassau, 78 AD2d 657). An order denying a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable. Moflen, P. J., Hopkins, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 26, 1980, which denied his motion for “leave to reargue and renew” his prior application to vacate a default judgment entered against him. Appeal dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Defendant’s motion to reargue and renew was, in reality a motion only to reargue, as no new matter was presented which was unavailable to the defendant prior to the denial of his application to vacate a default judgment (Matter of Samson v County of Nassau, 78 AD2d 657). An order denying a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable. Moflen, P. J., Hopkins, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 605, 441 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flock-v-flock-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack