Sampson v. New York City Housing Authority

256 A.D.2d 19, 680 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12791
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 1, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 19 (Sampson v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sampson v. New York City Housing Authority, 256 A.D.2d 19, 680 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J., and a jury), entered August 5, 1997, awarding plaintiffs structured damages based on the principal sum of $960,000, as reduced by the trial court from $1.6 million, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury’s finding that the infant plaintiff ingested paint containing lead, and as a result suffers from hyperactivity, attention deficit disorder and loss of cognitive function, and will likely suffer from kidney, liver and hearing dysfunctions, is not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s present argument challenging the methodology used by plaintiffs’ experts was waived by the absence of timely objection on that ground (Horton v Smith, 51 NY2d 798), and was not cured by a motion to strike the testimony at the close of the case (see, Rubio v Reilly, 44 AD2d 592). We find that the award, as reduced, does not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation (cf., Miller v Beaugrand, 169 AD2d 537, lv denied 77 NY2d 810; Hancock v 330 Hull Realty Corp., 225 AD2d 365). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallaeh and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp.
58 A.D.3d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Mateo v. Tuttle
26 A.D.3d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Jiminez v. City of New York
7 A.D.3d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Cavallaro v. Somaskanda
280 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Wylie v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
261 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D.2d 19, 680 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1998.