Horton v. Smith
This text of 412 N.E.2d 1318 (Horton v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that the police officer’s testimony as to the point of impact was "without objection on the part of plaintiff”.
When a timely objection is not made, the testimony offered is presumed to have been unobjectionable and any alleged error considered waived. (CPLR 4017; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 4017.05, at pp 40-87 to 40-88.)
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 N.E.2d 1318, 51 N.Y.2d 798, 433 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-smith-ny-1980.