Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 4, 2023·No. 04-22-00637-CV·Published

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 4, 2023

No. 04-22-00637-CV

Samantha SALINAS, Appellant

v.

Kathryn Gene TORRES, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule, Appellees

From the County Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2022-0076 Wade J. Hedtke, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s brief was originally due on October 28, 2022. On December 12, 2022, we issued an order informing appellant that her brief was overdue and ordering her to show cause in writing on or before December 27, 2022, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant filed a response to our order, asking that the appeal not be dismissed for want of prosecution. However, to date, appellant has not filed an appellant’s brief. Appellant is ORDERED to file an appellant’s brief that complies with Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on or before January 19, 2023. If appellant fails to file the required appellant’s brief on or before January 19, 2023, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule (Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.