Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 2022·No. 04-22-00637-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00637-CV

Samantha SALINAS, Appellant

v.

Kathryn Gene TORRES, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule, Appellees

From the County Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2022-0076 Wade J. Hedtke, Judge Presiding

ORDER The clerk’s record was filed on September 28, 2022. The trial court clerk advised the clerk of this court that no reporter’s record was taken. Therefore, appellant’s brief was due to be filed by October 28, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time have been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of December, 2022.

_________________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule (Samantha Salinas v. Kathryn Gene Torres, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.