Salter v. City of Thomaston

409 S.E.2d 88, 200 Ga. App. 536, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 1991
DocketA91A0933, A91A1023
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 409 S.E.2d 88 (Salter v. City of Thomaston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salter v. City of Thomaston, 409 S.E.2d 88, 200 Ga. App. 536, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was employed by the City of Thomaston. His employment was terminated and he appealed to the City Manager. Following a hearing in which testimony was presented and preserved, the City Manager made findings of fact and conclusions upholding the termination of appellant’s employment. The “decision” of the City Manager, rendered on December 28, 1990, reads: “It is the decision of the City Manager that the termination of the employment of Mr. Salter by Mr. Green is approved, and Mr. Salter’s appeal therefrom is denied.” (Emphasis supplied.)

On January 28, 1991, appellant presented a petition for a writ of certiorari to the superior court. The superior court dismissed the petition, ruling that it was presented out of time.

Appellant sought and we granted a discretionary appeal from the order of dismissal. The discretionary appeal bears Case No. A91A1023. In addition, appellant directly appealed from the order of dismissal. The direct appeal bears Case No. A91A0933. Held:

1. We are without jurisdiction to entertain the direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Accordingly, Case No. A91A0933 must be dismissed. See Hogan v. Taylor County Bd. of Education, 157 Ga. App. 680 (278 SE2d 106).

2. The superior court erred in dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of certiorari. The petition was timely. The last day for filing the *537 petition for a writ of certiorari fell on a Sunday. Thus, appellant had until Monday, January 28, 1991 to file the petition. OCGA § 9-11-6 (a). The superior court erred in ruling otherwise.

Decided July 16, 1991. Virgil L. Brown & Associates, Virgil L. Brown, Bentley C. Adams III, Eric D. Hearn, for appellant. Adams, Barfield & Dunaway, David B. Dunaway, for appellee.

Conceding the petition for a writ of certiorari was presented in a timely fashion, the City argues that the trial court did not err in dismissing the petition anyway because the City Manager did not exercise judicial powers in making his decision. We disagree.

In entertaining appellant’s appeal, the City Manager clearly “performed the function of a civil service board. It has been generally held that the rulings of such tribunals are quasi-judicial in nature. [Cits.]” Raughton v. Town of Fort Oglethorpe, 177 Ga. App. 171, 172 (338 SE2d 754). Thus, the city manager’s decision was subject to review by petition for a writ of certiorari. OCGA § 5-4-1 (a); Raughton v. Town of Fort Oglethorpe, supra.

Appeal dismissed in Case No. A91A0933. Judgment reversed in Case No. A91A1023.

Sognier, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolfe v. Board of Regents
794 S.E.2d 85 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Crumpler v. Henry County
571 S.E.2d 822 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
BD. OF COM'RS OF EFFINGHAM CTY. v. Farmer
493 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Glynn County v. Waters
491 S.E.2d 370 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 S.E.2d 88, 200 Ga. App. 536, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salter-v-city-of-thomaston-gactapp-1991.