Salomon v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Salomon v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 979, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2766

United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided October 24, 1927·No. Docket No. 12231.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION.

TRAmmell:

This case is controlled by our decision in the case of Leon Salomon, 4 B. T. A. 1109, in which the same state of facts [981]*981for 1922 was considered. There we held that the Commissioner erred in including in the income of the petitioner the salary, of the petitioner’s wife in the amount of $3,600.

Judgment will be entered for the petitioner on IB days' notice, under Rule 50.

Considered by Mokhis, Mtordock, and Siefkin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION.

TRAmmell:

This case is controlled by our decision in the case of Leon Salomon, 4 B. T. A. 1109, in which the same state of facts [981]*981for 1922 was considered. There we held that the Commissioner erred in including in the income of the petitioner the salary, of the petitioner’s wife in the amount of $3,600.

Judgment will be entered for the petitioner on IB days' notice, under Rule 50.

Considered by Mokhis, Mtordock, and Siefkin.

Salomon v. Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 979, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2766 (bta 1927).

Pincite

8 B.T.A. 979 (Salomon v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related