Salomon v. Bergin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Salomon v. Bergin

62 A.D.2d 1052, 404 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11137

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1052 (Salomon v. Bergin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salomon v. Bergin, 62 A.D.2d 1052, 404 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In an automobile negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 30, 1977, which denied his motion for a protective order vacating a notice for the discovery and inspection of a copy of any statement given by the defendant to his insurance representative, broker or agent with reference to the accident in question. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The matter sought constitutes material prepared for the purposes of litigation and as such cannot be obtained (see CPLR 3101, subd [d]; Finegold v Lewis, 22 AD2d 447; Kandel v Tocher, 22 AD2d 513; 3A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3101.50b). Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an automobile negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 30, 1977, which denied his motion for a protective order vacating a notice for the discovery and inspection of a copy of any statement given by the defendant to his insurance representative, broker or agent with reference to the accident in question. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The matter sought constitutes material prepared for the purposes of litigation and as such cannot be obtained (see CPLR 3101, subd [d]; Finegold v Lewis, 22 AD2d 447; Kandel v Tocher, 22 AD2d 513; 3A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3101.50b). Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1052, 404 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salomon-v-bergin-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack