Sally Randall v. Rolls-Royce Corpor

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sally Randall v. Rolls-Royce Corpor. Read the opinion of the Court — 637 F.3d 818
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 31, 2011·No. 10-3446·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 31, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 10‐3446

SALLY A. RANDALL and RONA C. Appeal from the United States PEPMEIER, District Court for the Southern Plaintiffs‐Appellants, District of Indiana, Indianapolis and Division. KAREN GOVERNOR and BARBARA JONES, Proposed Intervening Plaintiffs/Appellants, No. 1:06‐cv‐00860‐SEB‐WGH v. ROLLS‐ROYCE CORPORATION, et al., Sarah Evans Barker, Defendants‐Appellees. Judge.

O R D E R

The Court’s opinion issued on March 30, 2011, is hereby amended as follows:

At the end of the first paragraph on page 2, lines 16 and 17, the references to “N.D.” in the three district court opinions cited should be “S.D.”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sally Randall v. Rolls-Royce Corpor, (7th Cir. 2011).

Sally Randall v. Rolls-Royce Corpor (Sally Randall v. Rolls-Royce Corpor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.