Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick
148 A.2d 527, 102 N.H. 1, 1959 N.H. LEXIS 1
Opinion
It is established law that where an adequate remedy is available upon appeal, certiorari will not be granted. Waisman v. Manchester, 96 N. H. 50, 52; Nashua v. Public Utilities Commission, 101 N. H. 503. If the defendants have been aggrieved by the rulings of the Trial Court adequate review can be obtained by a bill of exceptions. RSA 490:10; Bagley v. Small, 92 N. H. 107, 108.
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick, 148 A.2d 527, 102 N.H. 1, 1959 N.H. LEXIS 1 (N.H. 1959).
148 A.2d 527 (Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reed v. Nat’l Council of the Boy Scouts
2010 DNH 018 (D. New Hampshire, 2010)
Myatt v. Town of Hampton
D. New Hampshire, 1997