Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick

148 A.2d 527, 102 N.H. 1, 1959 N.H. LEXIS 1

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedFebruary 20, 1959

Docket4712

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 148 A.2d 527 (Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick, 148 A.2d 527, 102 N.H. 1, 1959 N.H. LEXIS 1 (N.H. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

It is established law that where an adequate remedy is available upon appeal, certiorari will not be granted. Waisman v. Manchester, 96 N. H. 50, 52; Nashua v. Public Utilities Commission, 101 N. H. 503. If the defendants have been aggrieved by the rulings of the Trial Court adequate review can be obtained by a bill of exceptions. RSA 490:10; Bagley v. Small, 92 N. H. 107, 108.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

It is established law that where an adequate remedy is available upon appeal, certiorari will not be granted. Waisman v. Manchester, 96 N. H. 50, 52; Nashua v. Public Utilities Commission, 101 N. H. 503. If the defendants have been aggrieved by the rulings of the Trial Court adequate review can be obtained by a bill of exceptions. RSA 490:10; Bagley v. Small, 92 N. H. 107, 108.

Petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 A.2d 527, 102 N.H. 1, 1959 N.H. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salem-cooperative-bank-v-southwick-nh-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack