Saldivar, Jaime Fransisco
This text of Saldivar, Jaime Fransisco (Saldivar, Jaime Fransisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-68,774-02
EX PARTE JAIME FRANCISCO SALDIVAR, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 02-CR-1646-C
IN THE 404TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CAMERON COUNTY
Per curiam.Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment.
Applicant alleges that his counsel was ineffective for filing a petition for discretionary review on his behalf without informing him that he had a right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommended that relief be granted.
To gain relief on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Applicant has to prove both that counsel's performance was deficient and that counsel's deficient performance harmed Applicant. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Hernandez v. State, 726 S.W.2d 53, 56-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984). Applicant does not allege or show how he was harmed by counsel's filing of a petition for discretionary review on his behalf.
Based on this Court's independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.
Filed: March 17, 2010
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Saldivar, Jaime Fransisco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saldivar-jaime-fransisco-texcrimapp-2010.