Salcido v. State
342 S.W.2d 760, 170 Tex. Crim. 572
Opinions
The offense is burglary; the punishment, five years.
The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salcido v. State, 342 S.W.2d 760, 170 Tex. Crim. 572 (Tex. 1961).
342 S.W.2d 760 (Salcido v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Santos Joel Flores Jr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014
Temple v. State
342 S.W.3d 572 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
David Mark Temple v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010
Streff v. State
890 S.W.2d 815 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Reyes v. State
741 S.W.2d 414 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Bush v. State
642 S.W.2d 787 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Mason v. State
449 S.W.2d 47 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Salcido v. State
342 S.W.2d 760 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)