Salazar v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
674 So. 2d 937, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6322, 1996 WL 313059
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1996·No. No. 95-3237·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse the UAC’s decision denying benefits and remand with direction to reinstate the award made by the appeals referee. It is not the role of the UAC to modify or add facts. See Palmere v. Computerland, 626 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); David Clark & Assoc., Inc. v. Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salazar v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 674 So. 2d 937, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6322, 1996 WL 313059 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
674 So. 2d 937 (Salazar v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Feliciano v. Feliciano
674 So. 2d 937 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)