Salazar v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

674 So. 2d 937, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6322, 1996 WL 313059
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 12, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3237
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 674 So. 2d 937 (Salazar v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salazar v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 674 So. 2d 937, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6322, 1996 WL 313059 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the UAC’s decision denying benefits and remand with direction to reinstate the award made by the appeals referee. It is not the role of the UAC to modify or add facts. See Palmere v. Computerland, 626 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); David Clark & Assoc., Inc. v. Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feliciano v. Feliciano
674 So. 2d 937 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 So. 2d 937, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6322, 1996 WL 313059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-1996.