Palmere v. Computerland
This text of 626 So. 2d 1114 (Palmere v. Computerland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission is reversed. In rejecting the appeals referee’s holding that appellant was qualified for unemployment compensation benefits, the commission reweighed the evidence and included additional facts to justify its decision contrary to that of the referee. This is not permitted. See Forkey & Kirsch, P.A. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 407 So.2d 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); David Clark and Assocs. v. Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The referee’s decision was based on competent substantial evidence. The commission’s rejection of it was error.
Reversed and remanded for reinstatement of the referee’s order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
626 So. 2d 1114, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11772, 1993 WL 482331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmere-v-computerland-fladistctapp-1993.