Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Salazar v. State

486 S.W.2d 323, 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2335

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 25, 1972

Docket45724, 45725

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 486 S.W.2d 323 (Salazar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salazar v. State, 486 S.W.2d 323, 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2335 (Tex. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

These are appeals from judgments forfeiting bail bonds.

The parties to these causes through a joint motion, pray that they be reversed and remanded for the purpose of entering a compromise settlement.

Bond forfeiture appeals are governed by “the same rules that govern civil actions where an appeal is taken or a writ of error sued out”. Article 44.44, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Reeves v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 465 S.W.2d 757.

*324 A judgment of reversal will be entered when parties to a civil cause on appeal, through a joint motion, request that the cause be reversed for the purpose of entering an agreed judgment. Butler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 907, and the cases cited therein.

The judgments are reversed and the causes remanded to the 167th District Court of Travis County, and the clerk is directed to issue mandates immediately upon the announcement of this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI