Reeves v. State

465 S.W.2d 757
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 1971·No. No. 43737·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a bail forfeiture.

The record reflects that on September IS, 1970, the State and appellants appeared in open court and entered into an agreed judgment in said cause.

Appellants complain on appeal that the agreed judgment is improper in that it states: “But after a reasonable time the said defendant not appearing and having wholly made default, * * * ” and that this is not a proper allegation pursuant to the terms of the bail bond. Appellants neither brief nor cite authority for this proposition.

In appeals of this nature, the Rules of Civil Procedure apply, Art. 44.-44, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Gaither et al. v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 503, 244 S.W.2d 209, and failure to brief an assignment of error constitutes waiver. Burrell v. VanLoh, Tex.Civ.App., 404 S.W.2d 860.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeves v. State, 465 S.W.2d 757 (Tex. 1971).

465 S.W.2d 757 (Reeves v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trenard Jermaine Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018
Hayes v. State
495 S.W.2d 897 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Salazar v. State
486 S.W.2d 323 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Butler v. State
481 S.W.2d 907 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)