Home/California Supreme Court/Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED

Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED

63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 708, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 940, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 516
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 22, 2003
DocketS111876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 P.3d 215 (Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED, 63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 708, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 940, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 516 (Cal. 2003).

Opinion

130 Cal.Rptr.2d 656 (2003)
63 P.3d 215

Raquel SALAZAR, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S111876.

Supreme Court of California, En Banc.

January 22, 2003.

Petition for review GRANTED.

*657 GEORGE, C.J, and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Panther v. Park
63 P.3d 215 (California Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 708, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 940, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-v-diversified-paratransit-incorporated-cal-2003.