Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED

63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 708, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 940, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 516
California Supreme Court·Decided January 22, 2003·No. S111876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

130 Cal.Rptr.2d 656 (2003)
63 P.3d 215

Raquel SALAZAR, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S111876.

Supreme Court of California, En Banc.

January 22, 2003.

Petition for review GRANTED.

*657 GEORGE, C.J, and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED, 63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 708, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 940, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 516 (Cal. 2003).

63 P.3d 215 (Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Panther v. Park
63 P.3d 215 (California Supreme Court, 2003)