Panther v. Park
63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 509, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 652, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 1289
This text of 63 P.3d 215 (Panther v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Panther v. Park, 63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 509, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 652, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 1289 (Cal. 2003).
Opinion
James PANTHER, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
William K. PARK et al., Defendants and Respondents.
and related actions
Supreme Court of California, En Banc.
The above-entitled review is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, with directions to vacate its decision and the dismiss the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to written request of counsel for petitioner below.
GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED
63 P.3d 215 (California Supreme Court, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 P.3d 215, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 509, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 652, 2003 Cal. LEXIS 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panther-v-park-cal-2003.