Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X
PAUL SALADINO, MD.,
ORDER OF DEFAULT
- against - 20 cv 09346 (NSR)
FRANK TUFANO and FRANKIE FREE-RANGE MEAT, LLC,
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------X
Nelson S. Román, D.J.:
WHEREAS, this action was commenced on November 7, 2020, by the filing of the Summons and Complaint, and a copy of the Summons and Complaint was personally served on the Defendant Frank Tufano, on November 20, 2020, by personal service, and a proof of service was filed on November 25, 2020; WHEREAS on March 9, 2021, Plaintiff served the Co-Defendant Frankie’s Free-Range Meat, LLC, with the Summons and First Amended Complaint, by effectuating service upon the New York Secretary of State and proof of service was filed on March 16, 2021; WHEREAS despite having received service of process, the Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie’s Free-Range Meat, LLC have not answered the First Amended Complaint, and the time for the Defendants to answer the First Amended Complaint has lapsed; WHEREAS in the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has asserted five separate causes of action sounding in violations of the Lanham Act, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and 15 USC § 1125(d), New York State Gen. Bus. Law 148, New York State Gen. Bus. Law §349, and common law Defamation; WHEREAS it is an “ancient common law axiom” that a defendant who defaults thereby admits all “well-pleaded” factual allegations contained in the complaint. City of New York v.
Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC, 645 F.3d 114, 137 (2d Cir. 2011) quoting Vt. Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 Beargram, Co., 373 F.3d 241, 246 (2d Cir. 2004); WHEREAS Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie’s Free-Range Meat, LLC have defaulted in this action; WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on all of his claims, including under the Lanham Act, consisting of compensatory, punitive and statutory damages (in the amount of $100.000.00), pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, reasonable attorney’s fees and cost; WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks a Court Order enjoining Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie Free-Range Meat. LLC, and those acting in concert, from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning the Plaintiff;
WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks a Court Order Directing the Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie Free-Range Meat. LLC, to forthwith delete and remove any and all defamatory videos from Defendant Frank Tufano’s YouTube Channel; WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks a Court Order Directing the Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie Free-Range Meat. LLC, to immediately take down, remove, delete the defamatory website
reasonable time permanently transfer the Domain Name
c. The video published October 16, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4phKzDtfkE; d. The video published October 18, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qTeIKWcCg8; e. The video published October 31, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycGK23AC4J4; f. The Nov. 19, 2020 Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4eEVzzaylM; and e. any other video containing defamatory statements related to Plaintiff; and ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The parties are directed to contact the Chambers of the Honorable Judge Judith C. McCarthy for the purpose of scheduling a hearing and issuing a Report and Recommendation on an assessment of damages, including compensatory and statutory damages, reasonable attorney’s fees and cost. Dated: White Plains, New York SO ORDERED: January 30, 2025 _________________________ Hon. Nelson S. Roman U.S. District Court Judge, S.D.N.Y.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano (Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.