Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 2025
Docket7:20-cv-09346
StatusUnknown

This text of Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano (Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X

PAUL SALADINO, MD.,

ORDER OF DEFAULT

- against - 20 cv 09346 (NSR)

FRANK TUFANO and FRANKIE FREE-RANGE MEAT, LLC,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------X

Nelson S. Román, D.J.:

WHEREAS, this action was commenced on November 7, 2020, by the filing of the Summons and Complaint, and a copy of the Summons and Complaint was personally served on the Defendant Frank Tufano, on November 20, 2020, by personal service, and a proof of service was filed on November 25, 2020; WHEREAS on March 9, 2021, Plaintiff served the Co-Defendant Frankie’s Free-Range Meat, LLC, with the Summons and First Amended Complaint, by effectuating service upon the New York Secretary of State and proof of service was filed on March 16, 2021; WHEREAS despite having received service of process, the Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie’s Free-Range Meat, LLC have not answered the First Amended Complaint, and the time for the Defendants to answer the First Amended Complaint has lapsed; WHEREAS in the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has asserted five separate causes of action sounding in violations of the Lanham Act, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and 15 USC § 1125(d), New York State Gen. Bus. Law 148, New York State Gen. Bus. Law §349, and common law Defamation; WHEREAS it is an “ancient common law axiom” that a defendant who defaults thereby admits all “well-pleaded” factual allegations contained in the complaint. City of New York v.

Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC, 645 F.3d 114, 137 (2d Cir. 2011) quoting Vt. Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 Beargram, Co., 373 F.3d 241, 246 (2d Cir. 2004); WHEREAS Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie’s Free-Range Meat, LLC have defaulted in this action; WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on all of his claims, including under the Lanham Act, consisting of compensatory, punitive and statutory damages (in the amount of $100.000.00), pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, reasonable attorney’s fees and cost; WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks a Court Order enjoining Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie Free-Range Meat. LLC, and those acting in concert, from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning the Plaintiff;

WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks a Court Order Directing the Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie Free-Range Meat. LLC, to forthwith delete and remove any and all defamatory videos from Defendant Frank Tufano’s YouTube Channel; WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks a Court Order Directing the Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie Free-Range Meat. LLC, to immediately take down, remove, delete the defamatory website ; WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks a Court Order Directing the Defendants Frank Tufano and Frankie Free-Range Meat. LLC, to immediately transfer ownership of the domain name to Plaintiff; it is herby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That Plaintiff is hereby entitled to and is granted a Judgment of Default as to each and every claim as against each named Defendant Frank Tufano and Frankie’s Free-Range Meat, LLC, on the issue of liability; ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That Defendants shall forthwith or within a

reasonable time permanently transfer the Domain Name to Plaintiff; ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That Defendants are enjoined from making public statements referencing that Plaintiff copied, plagiarized, stole or otherwise improperly used Defendants’ or any other third party’s work; engages in dishonest practices in connection with his business, trade, or profession; abuses prescription or illegal drugs; improperly or illegally manipulates social media posts; or engages in any inappropriate sexual activity; ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That Defendants are directed to forthwith remove and delete all of the defamatory videos on Defendant’s YouTube channel related to Plaintiff, including: a. The First Nov. 7, 2019 Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyXgRJ99gks; b. The video published February 5, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJI8H1_joO8;

c. The video published October 16, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4phKzDtfkE; d. The video published October 18, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qTeIKWcCg8; e. The video published October 31, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycGK23AC4J4; f. The Nov. 19, 2020 Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4eEVzzaylM; and e. any other video containing defamatory statements related to Plaintiff; and ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The parties are directed to contact the Chambers of the Honorable Judge Judith C. McCarthy for the purpose of scheduling a hearing and issuing a Report and Recommendation on an assessment of damages, including compensatory and statutory damages, reasonable attorney’s fees and cost. Dated: White Plains, New York SO ORDERED: January 30, 2025 _________________________ Hon. Nelson S. Roman U.S. District Court Judge, S.D.N.Y.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC
645 F.3d 114 (Second Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Saladino, MD v. Frank Tufano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saladino-md-v-frank-tufano-nysd-2025.