Saladin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Saladin v. State

194 So. 3d 471, 2016 WL 3017495, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7913

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 25, 2016

DocketNo. 3D15-2182

StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 3d 471 (Saladin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saladin v. State, 194 So. 3d 471, 2016 WL 3017495, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

Andres Saladin appeals the trial court’s revocation of his probation and sentence.

We affirm without discussion the revocation and sentence as the State proved by a preponderance of the evidence the violation relied on by the trial court to revoke Saladin’s probation. However, we remand [472]*472the case to the trial court for entry of a written order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, a necessary step which the trial court failed to do in this case. See Hulse v. State, 170 So.3d 911, 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Owens v. State, 141 So.3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Brown v. State, 127 So.3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

,The order and sentence are affirmed; the case is remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELLS, Judge.

Andres Saladin appeals the trial court’s revocation of his probation and sentence.

We affirm without discussion the revocation and sentence as the State proved by a preponderance of the evidence the violation relied on by the trial court to revoke Saladin’s probation. However, we remand [472]*472the case to the trial court for entry of a written order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, a necessary step which the trial court failed to do in this case. See Hulse v. State, 170 So.3d 911, 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Owens v. State, 141 So.3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Brown v. State, 127 So.3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

,The order and sentence are affirmed; the case is remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 So. 3d 471, 2016 WL 3017495, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saladin-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack