Brown v. State

127 So. 3d 831, 2013 WL 6224033, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18919
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 27, 2013·No. Nos. 3D12-890, 3D12-889·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion Appellant’s adjudications and sentences following his probation revocation hearing. However, the trial court failed to reduce to writing its oral pronouncement of the -violations and revocation of Appellant’s probation. We therefore remand this cause to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation of probation which, consistent with its oral pronouncement at the hearing, sets forth the conditions of probation that Appellant violated. See Daniels v. State, 45 So.3d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Nelson v. State, 670 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 127 So. 3d 831, 2013 WL 6224033, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18919 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

127 So. 3d 831 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Onelio Castro v. the State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
M.C. v. State
239 So. 3d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Mitchell v. State
238 So. 3d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Saladin v. State
194 So. 3d 471 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Wagner v. State
201 So. 3d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Hulse v. State
170 So. 3d 911 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Hulse Justin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015
Watkins v. State
163 So. 3d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)