Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L.

603 F.3d 888, 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 12, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7655, 2010 WL 1488520
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 14, 2010
Docket08-10848
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 603 F.3d 888 (Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L., 603 F.3d 888, 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 12, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7655, 2010 WL 1488520 (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinions

ORDER:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 F.3d 888, 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 12, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7655, 2010 WL 1488520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sahyers-v-prugh-holliday-karatinos-pl-ca11-2010.