Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L.
603 F.3d 888, 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 12, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7655, 2010 WL 1488520
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 14, 2010·No. 08-10848·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinions
ORDER:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L., 603 F.3d 888, 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 12, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7655, 2010 WL 1488520 (11th Cir. 2010).
603 F.3d 888 (Sahyers v. Prugh, Holliday & Karatinos, P.L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tryco Enterprises Inc., Sharon C. Dixon, James Dixon, Crown Staffing, Inc. and Troy Keith Dixon v. James A. Robinson
390 S.W.3d 497 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)
Tryco Enterprises Inc., Sharon C. Dixon, James Dixon, Crown Staffing, Inc. and Troy Keith Dixon v. James A. Robinson
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012
United States v. Ali Shaygan
676 F.3d 1237 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Dees v. Hydradry, Inc.
706 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (M.D. Florida, 2010)