Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. Commonwealth

303 A.2d 822, 455 Pa. 632, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 805
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 4, 1973·No. Appeal, No. 80·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Nix, and Mr. Justice Manderino dissent for the reasons expressed in Biello v. Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 187, 301 A. 2d 849, 853 (1973) (dissenting opinion by Nix, J., in which Roberts, J., joined).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. Commonwealth, 303 A.2d 822, 455 Pa. 632, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 805 (Pa. 1973).

303 A.2d 822 (Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLeo v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.
42 Pa. D. & C.3d 572 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1986)
Porter v. Borough of West Chester
43 Pa. D. & C.3d 232 (Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 1984)
Harris v. RUNDLE
366 A.2d 970 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)