Sacramento Downtown Arena LLC v. Factory Mutual Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 10, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00441·Unknown

Opinion

1 RICHARD R. PATCH (State Bar No. 88049) HOWARD A. SLAVITT (State Bar No. 172840) 2 FREDRICK C. CROMBIE (State Bar No. 244051) BENJAMIN C. PULLIAM (State Bar No. 294628) 3 COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP One Montgomery Street, Suite 3000 4 San Francisco, California 94104-5500 Telephone: 415.391.4800 5 Facsimile: 415.989.1663 Email: ef-rrp@cpdb.com 6 ef-has@cpdb.com ef-fcc@cpdb.com 7 ef-bcp@cpdb.com

8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SACRAMENTO DOWNTOWN ARENA LLC; 9 SACRAMENTO KINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; SAC MUB1 HOTEL, LLC; 10 and SGD RETAIL LLC

11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 SACRAMENTO DOWNTOWN ARENA No. 2:21-cv-00441KJM DB LLC; SACRAMENTO KINGS LIMITED 15 PARTNERSHIP; SAC MUB1 HOTEL, LLC; STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER and SGD RETAIL LLC, 16 FOR STANDARD LITIGATION

17 Plaintiffs,

18 v.

19 FACTORY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 20

21 Defendants.

23 24 25 26 27 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 5 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 6 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 7 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 8 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 9 under applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, 10 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 11 under seal. Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards 12 that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 15 information or items under this Order. 16 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 17 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 18 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 19 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: sensitive 20 “CONFIDENTIAL” information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or 21 tangible things that the Designating Party reasonably believes in good faith that disclosure of such 22 Disclosure or Discovery Material directly to another Party or Non-Party, other than as permitted 23 pursuant to this Order, would create a likelihood of harm to the business, financial, personal, 24 competitive, or commercial interests of the Designating Party, is otherwise substantially likely to 25 cause injury to the Designating Party, and/or involves private medical information of third party 26 individuals. 27 2.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 1 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 2 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 3 “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 4 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all documents, items or information, regardless 5 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other 6 things, electronically stored information (“ESI”), testimony, transcripts, tangible things, and 7 physical objects), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this 8 matter. 9 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 10 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 11 consultant in this action. 12 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 13 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 14 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 15 entity not named as a Party to this action. 16 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 17 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 18 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 19 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 20 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 21 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 22 Material in this action. 23 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 24 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and collecting, 25 processing, reviewing, organizing, hosting, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 26 their employees and subcontractors. 27 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 1 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 2 Producing Party. 3 3. SCOPE 4 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 5 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 6 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 7 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 8 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 9 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 10 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a 11 result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public 12 record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to 13 the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained 14 the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any 15 use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 16 4. DURATION 17 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 18 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 19 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 20 and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 21 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 22 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 23 applicable law. 24 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 25 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 26 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 27 limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 1 oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 2 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within 3 the ambit of this Order. 4 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sacramento Downtown Arena LLC v. Factory Mutual Ins. Co., (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Sacramento Downtown Arena LLC v. Factory Mutual Ins. Co. (Sacramento Downtown Arena LLC v. Factory Mutual Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)