Sabin v. Gilman

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Sabin v. Gilman

1 N.H. 193

CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire

DecidedSeptember 15, 1818

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 N.H. 193 (Sabin v. Gilman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sabin v. Gilman, 1 N.H. 193 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

It has long been settled, in this state, that neither an executor nor an-administrator can prosecute an action in our courts by virtue of letters granted to him under the authority of another state. 3 Mass. Rep. 514, Goodwin vs. Jones. — 1 Cranch 259, Fenwick vs. Sears, admin[194]*194istrator. — 3 Cranch 319, Dixon’s Executors vs. Ramsay’s Executors. The replication is insufficient, and the .defendant is entitled to judgment.

Judgmen t for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

It has long been settled, in this state, that neither an executor nor an-administrator can prosecute an action in our courts by virtue of letters granted to him under the authority of another state. 3 Mass. Rep. 514, Goodwin vs. Jones. — 1 Cranch 259, Fenwick vs. Sears, admin[194]*194istrator. — 3 Cranch 319, Dixon’s Executors vs. Ramsay’s Executors. The replication is insufficient, and the .defendant is entitled to judgment.

Judgmen t for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.H. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabin-v-gilman-nhsuperct-1818.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack