Sabeniano v. Citibank, N.A. New York

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ==> SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK eo DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: Modesta R. Sabeniano Dae FILED: 9/28/21 _ Plaintiff, 16-cv-1723 (AJN) —V— ORDER Citibank, N.A., Citigroup, Inc. Defendants.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On September 21, 2021, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff that, among other things, requested a conference regarding the collection of a foreign judgment. Dkt. No. 96. This Court’s June 1 Order details the history of this case and thus the Court will not repeat it here. Dkt. No. 93. In light of the filing injunction and for the reasons stated in the Court’s August 14, 2020 order and June 1, 2021 order, Plaintiff's request for a conference is DENIED. Plaintiff is advised that the filing injunction cannot be circumvented by addressing letters to other members of this Court. See Dkt. No. 97. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to note that mailing on the public docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2021

New York, New York MN | 3

ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge