S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

Second Circuit

S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

426 F.2d 290

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1970

DocketNo. 517, Docket 33613

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 426 F.2d 290 (S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board, 426 F.2d 290 (2d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court, holding (1) the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended (50 [291]*291U.S.C. App. § 1211 et seq.) to be applicable to excessive profits realized under a Capehart Act housing contract (42 U.S.C §§ 1594-1594k; 12 U.S.C. §§ 1748-1748h-3) and (2) such application to be constitutional, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Mulroney, reported at 51 T.C. No. 89 (March 4, 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court, holding (1) the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended (50 [291]*291U.S.C. App. § 1211 et seq.) to be applicable to excessive profits realized under a Capehart Act housing contract (42 U.S.C §§ 1594-1594k; 12 U.S.C. §§ 1748-1748h-3) and (2) such application to be constitutional, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Mulroney, reported at 51 T.C. No. 89 (March 4, 1969).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

426 F.2d 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-s-silberblatt-inc-v-renegotiation-board-ca2-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack