S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. And the Sterling Company v. The Renegotiation Board

Second Circuit

S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. And the Sterling Company v. The Renegotiation Board

426 F.2d 290, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9402

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1970

Docket33613

StatusPublished

This text of 426 F.2d 290 (S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. And the Sterling Company v. The Renegotiation Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. And the Sterling Company v. The Renegotiation Board, 426 F.2d 290, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9402 (2d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

426 F.2d 290

S. S. SILBERBLATT, INC. and The Sterling Company, Appellants,
v.
The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellee.

No. 517, Docket 33613.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued April 20, 1970.
Decided May 5, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court, holding (1) the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 1211 et seq.) to be applicable to excessive profits realized under a Capehart Act housing contract (42 U.S.C 1594-1594k; 12 U.S.C. 1748-1748h-3) and (2) such application to be constitutional, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Mulroney, reported at 51 T.C. No. 89 (March 4, 1969).

Charles H. Tuttle, New York City (Breed, Abbott & Morgan, Edward J. Ross and Miriam C. Feigelson, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Ronald R. Glancz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee.

---------------

1 Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI